PLEASE SUBMIT THE ARTICLES DIRECTLY TO THIS E-MAIL ADDRESS: dziakryba@hot.pl
INFORMATION FOR AUTHORS
Articles published in the WORLD MEDICINE JOURNAL examines widely understood topics in the study of management, where priority is given to publications presenting research results or relating to current problems of academic managerial issues and modern management concepts. The stamp of approval for the journal’s contents is done by the Scientific Council.
Authors are asked to use the following rules in publishing articles:
– Name(s) and surname of the author(s), their affiliation,
– Author’s Title in Russian and English,
– An abstract (max. 100 words) in Russian and English,
– Key words in Russian and English,
– Contents of the article in Russian or English,
– Captions of figures/tables in Russian and English,
– A bibliography.
– Name(s) and surname of the author(s),
– Current place of work,
– Position held,
– Nationality,
– A brief biographical note indicating the area of academic interest,
– An e-mail address, phone number, address for correspondence.
To facilitate the work of both the authors and editors, an Article Template has been prepared which should be used while writing the article. It includes example content based on the required editorial guidelines. Insert the material in the appropriate places while maintaining the format and style shown in the template.
PLEASE SUBMIT THE ARTICLES DIRECTLY TO THIS E-MAIL ADDRESS: dziakryba@hot.pl
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE REVIEW FORM TEMPLATE
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD AUTHOR’S DECLARATION
The procedure for reviewing articles submitted to the WORLD MEDICINE JOURNAL has been based on the recommendations presented in the brochure of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education titled Good Practices for Review Procedures in Research, Warsaw 2011. This paper is used as a guideline for the editorial board, the reviewers and also for those who cooperate with the editors of the WORLD MEDICINE JOURNAL, aiming for the highest ethical and moral standards, as well as the reliability of the reviews.
All submitted articles which meet the formal requirements outlined in the information for authors section of the website for the WORLD MEDICINE JOURNAL are given an identification number.
By decision of the Editor in Chief or Vice Editor in Chief, articles are submitted for review to two affiliated reviewers who are outside the parent unit, according to the double-blind review process, whereby the identity of author(s) and reviewers are not known to one another.
Articles are sent to reviewers by email (PDF format). Reviewers prepare a review within 3 weeks from the date which the email was sent.
All reviews are prepared in written in English.
The reviewer shall issue an opinion about the article and will complete a Review Form, which will end with one of the following statements:
a) The work is suitable for printing without change – the article is submitted to the Editorial Committee and is awaiting publication. The author* is notified of the planned date of publication by e-mail;
b) The work will be suitable for printing after taking into account the remarks contained in the opinion – The Editor sends the review sheet by e-mail to the author for making corrections in accordance with the comments of reviewer/reviewers. Author(s) have 2 weeks to incorporate the corrections and send the revised article by e-mail to the Editor;
c) The work requires complementary or additional research – proceed as above;
d) The work is not suitable for printing – in this case the Editor in Chief or Vice Editor in Chief disqualifies the article or, if the other review is markedly different, forwards it to another (additional) reviewer.
The reviewer shall send a review by email to dzikaryba@hot.pl. , in an unsecured file doc (docx) or PDF. The file name should include the article identification number assigned by the editors (eg. Review_1-2018.docx). The review may not include a signature or any data that identifies the reviewer.
A necessary condition for forwarding the manuscript to be printed is to obtain two positive reviews. The final decision to print the article is taken by the Editor in Chief or Vice Editor in Chief on the basis of the reviews and comments contained in them, and on the final version of the article provided by the author(s).
Articles which are not scientific in nature do not require review and are qualified for printing directly by the Editor in Chief or Vice Editor in Chief of the WORLD MEDICINE JOURNAL.
Rules on acceptance or rejection of the publication and the review form are available to the public on the website of the WORLD MEDICINE JOURNAL.
The names of reviewers of individual publications/issues are not disclosed. In the last issue of each year, and on the WORLD MEDICINE JOURNAL a list of the regular reviewers is shown.
* In the event of multiple authors published, all correspondence is between the editor and the author submitting the manuscript.
List of reviewers:
Yerkeblan M. Tazhbayev, DSc, Prof.
Rector of Buketov Karaganda State University, Kazakhstan
Jasur A. RIZAEV, DSc, Prof.
Rector of Samarkand State Medical Institute, Uzbekistan
Indira O. KUDAIBERGENOVA, DSc, Prof.,
Rector of the Kyrgyz State Medical Academy named after I.K. Akhunbaeva, Kyrgyzstan
Mahmud T. SULTANMURATOV, DSc, Prof.
Rector of the Eurasian International Medical University, Kyrgyzstan
Vasiliy M. MOROZ, DSc, Prof.
Rector of Vinnitsa National Medical University after N. Pirogov, Ukraine
Gabit G. MEYRAMOV, DSc, Prof.
Buketov Karaganda State University, Kazakhstan
Janusz SOBON, DSc, Prof.
The Jacob of Paradies Academy, Poland
Pavel PAVLOV, DSc, Prof.
Varna Free University, Bukgaria
Angela V. IGNATUK, DSc, Prof.
Taras Shevchenko University, Ukraine
Joanna ROGOZIŃSKA-MITRUT, DSc, Prof.
The Jacob of Paradies Academy, Poland
Samatbek S. TOIMATOV, DSc, Prof.
Eurasian International Medical University, Kyrgyzstan
Shukhrat H. ZIYADULLAEV, DSc, Prof.,
Samarkand State Medical Institute, Uzbekistan
Boris TOPOR, DSc, Prof.,
Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chisinau, Moldova
Andrey A. SOPUEV, DSc, Prof.
Kyrgyz State Medical Academy named after I.K. Akhunbaeva, Kyrgyzstan
Erkin S. ALYMBAEV, DSc, Prof.
Kyrgyz State Medical Academy named after I.K. Akhunbaeva, Kyrgyzstan
Oleg V. VLASENKO, DSc, Prof.
Vice Rector of Vinnitsa National Medical University after N. Pirogov, Ukraine
Igor V. GUNAS, DSc, Prof.
Vinnitsa National Medical University after N. Pirogov, Ukraine
Gaukhar J. JARILKASINOVA, Ph.D., As. Prof.
Vice-rector for Academic Affairs, Buhara State Medical Institution
Yelena V. MINAYEVA, Ph.D., As. Prof.
Buketov Karaganda State University, Kazakhstan
Akhatjon A. NASULLAEV, Ph.D., As. Prof.
Vice-rector for International affairs, Buhara State Medical Institution, Uzbekistan
Zafar Z. AMINOV, PhD, As. Prof.
Samarkand State Medical Institute, Uzbekistan
Ruslana V. SELEZNEVA, PhD, As. Prof.
Taras Shevchenko University, Ukraine
Duties of peer reviewers:
Contribution to editorial decisions
Peer review assists the Editor-in-Chief in making editorial decisions and, through the editorial communication with the author, may also assist the author in improving the manuscript.
Promptness
Any invited referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its timely review will be impossible should immediately notify the Editor-in-Chief so that alternative reviewers can be contacted.
Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except if authorized by the Editor-in-Chief.
Standards of objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inacceptable. Referees should express their views clearly with appropriate supporting arguments.
Acknowledgement of sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the Editor’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published data of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and conflict of interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider evaluating manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the submission.
© 2020. All Rights Reserved. Designed by Erizo.pl